Field test vs laboratory test: what are the differences for respiratory measurement?
- PAIRFS

- 3 days ago
- 3 min read
Why compare field testing and laboratory testing?
For a long time, measuring one's respiration and physiological thresholds (VT1, VT2) required a laboratory test , with a bulky mask, gas analyzers, a calibrated ergocycle and specialized personnel. Today, lighter devices allow these measurements to be carried out directly in the field , indoors as well as outdoors.
But the two approaches do not give exactly the same result — and each has its advantages.
This post helps you understand when to choose a field test , when to choose a lab test , and why respiratory analysis is now evolving towards field testing .
1. Laboratory testing: the historical reference
The laboratory test is based on a standardized protocol:
ergocycle or calibrated treadmill,
metabolic mask
continuous O₂ / CO₂ analysis,
precise incremental protocols,
controlled environment.
✔ Advantages
Maximum accuracy on gas exchange (VO₂, VCO₂).
Stable conditions (temperature, humidity, calibration).
Very good for measuring comprehensive parameters: VO₂max, RER, minute ventilation, running economy.
Ideal for scientific studies or in-depth medical assessments.
✘ Limits
Artificial environment: a cyclist may perform differently on an ergometer than on their bicycle.
Expensive and not easily accessible.
It is impossible to reproduce the actual race conditions (climbs, wind, position, cumulative fatigue).
It's difficult to do frequent tests.
👉 The lab gives a very precise image, but not always representative of the field.
2. The field test: measuring physiology under real-world conditions
With the arrival of more compact sensors like ZoneX, it is now possible to measure respiration on your own bike , outdoors or on a home trainer.
✔ Advantages
Actual practice conditions: position, cadence, slope, weather.
More representative of what you are capable of producing in competition.
Can be done regularly , without heavy logistics.
Allows you to assess your ventilatory thresholds in natural efforts: gradual increase, regular exit, structured session.
Useful for tracking training week after week .
✘ Limits
The environment is less controlled (temperature variations, wind, etc.).
Some advanced data (exact VO₂, RER, O₂ flow rate) are not always accessible.
Accuracy depends heavily on the quality of the sensor.
👉 The field gives an accurate picture of real performance — what you can really hold.
3. Field test vs lab test: what do they really measure?
🔹 The laboratory
Measures internal physiology with maximum resolution:
precise VO₂,
precise VCO₂,
The RER is very stable.
ventilation,
economy of movement.
🔹 The field
Measures physiological expression under real-world conditions , in particular:
respiratory dynamics
ventilation,
CO₂ production,
ventilatory transitions (VT1 / VT2).
Today, ventilatory thresholds can be determined as precisely in the field as in the laboratory , as long as the quality of respiratory measurement is good.
4. Why are athletes gradually switching to field testing?
Because what really matters... is what you are able to maintain in real life , not on a calibrated ergometer.
Athletes choose field testing for:
to calibrate their pacing for cyclosportive events or triathlons,
monitor the development of their areas every 2–3 weeks,
to avoid cardiac drift during sessions
adjust training loads continuously.
And most importantly: respiratory data obtained in the field are more representative of their actual performance.
5. How ZoneX unites the best of both worlds
ZoneX was designed to offer the accuracy of a lab test , but in real-world conditions , thanks to:
a compact and robust CO₂ sensor,
a stable ventilatory measurement,
VT1/VT2 automatic detection algorithms,
plug-and-play operation without calibration,
easy integration indoors or outdoors.
With ZoneX you can:
measure your breathing thresholds while driving,
Repeat the test as many times as you like.
Get your true physiological zones in minutes.
👉 Finally, a reliable, portable and accessible respiratory analysis.
Conclusion: lab or field?
The two approaches are not opposed: they complement each other.
The laboratory is ideal for very detailed metabolic analysis.
The terrain is perfect for defining your zones and tracking their evolution in your real environment.
Thanks to solutions like ZoneX, it is now possible to obtain high-quality respiratory measurements directly on your bike , which radically changes the way you train.




Comments