Why doesn't zone 2 work if your VT1 is incorrectly identified?
- PAIRFS

- 3 days ago
- 3 min read
Zone 2 has become a staple of endurance training. It's presented as the zone of fundamental endurance, mitochondrial development, and "easy but useful" work. But in reality, zone 2 only makes sense if your VT1 is correctly identified .
If your VT1 is misplaced — too high or too low — then your entire zone 2 becomes incorrect : inadequate intensity, diminished adaptations, unnecessary fatigue… and stagnant progress.
Here's why.
1. Zone 2 comes from VT1, not from some magic power or heart rate value
Many define zone 2 as a percentage of FTP, VO₂max, or heart rate. However, the true physiological marker for zone 2 is ventilatory threshold 1 (VT1).
VT1 = first ventilatory break → the moment when your ventilation starts to increase to eliminate the extra CO₂ produced by carbohydrate metabolism.
👉 Zone 2 is simply the area around and just below VT1 .
If VT1 is incorrectly identified → zone 2 loses all physiological meaning.
2. If your VT1 is placed too high, you no longer have zone 2
This is the most common trap:
💥 Many athletes train too close to VT2 thinking they are in zone 2.
Consequences :
You're switching to carbohydrate metabolism too early.
The ventilation system drifts rapidly.
The heart rate increases.
the session becomes a tiring and unproductive “grey area”.
👉 Result: you are not developing the aerobic base that zone 2 is supposed to strengthen.
3. If your VT1 is set too low, your sessions become too easy
Less frequent, but just as problematic.
If your Zone 2 is overestimated downwards:
Mitochondrial adaptations are slower,
Your aerobic system is underutilized.
You are lacking the minimum intensity necessary to progress.
👉 You are accumulating unnecessary hours, with low physiological output.
4. The problem with classical methods (FC, FTP, RPE)
Heart rate fluctuates according to:
the heat,
stress,
fatigue,
dehydration.
Power or pace does not reflect internal load , only mechanical effort.
Result :
🔥 You think you are in zone 2… but physiologically, you are above or below .
5. Why breathing provides an accurate (and reproducible) VT1
Studies show that:
Ventilatory thresholds are highly reproducible (r > 0.90),
Ventilation reacts immediately to metabolic transitions.
VT1 is an excellent indicator of the carbohydrate/lipid switchover.
Unlike lactate testing, there is no blood test, no strict protocol. Breathing reflects physiology in real time .
With ZoneX, VT1 is detected:
✔ automatically,
✔ Indoors as well as outdoors,
✔ on any type of session.
6. In summary: zone 2 only exists if VT1 is correct
For a Zone 2 session to truly deliver:
mitochondrial adaptation,
improved fat burning,
progression of aerobic metabolism,
respiratory stability,
VT1 needs to be measured precisely , and not estimated via approximate formulas.
👉 A zone 2 based on a poorly identified VT1 = a zone 2 which… is not a zone 2 .
Go further
Anselmi F. et al. (2021). The importance of ventilatory thresholds to define aerobic exercise intensity domains. PMC. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8456830/ PMC
Esteve-Lanao J., Foster C., Seiler S., Lucía A. (2007). Impact of training intensity distribution on performance in endurance athletes. J Strength Cond Res. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17685689/ PubMed
Stöggl TL, & Berglund B. (2015). The training intensity distribution among well-trained and elite endurance athletes. PMC. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4621419/ PMC
Sitko S. et al. (2025). What Is “Zone 2 Training”?: Experts' Viewpoint on Intensity Distribution and Physiological Foundations. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance. (forthcoming but already referenced) Human Kinetics Journals
Serna-Martínez M. et al. (2024). Oxygen Consumption, Ventilatory Thresholds, and Work Areas according to Ventilatory Thresholds. MDPI. https://www.mdpi.com/2411-5142/9/3/171 mdpi.com




Comments